⚖️ From the record · This story is based on a court judgment or official record and reports only what the record says.
PACL refund: SEBI appellate authority dismisses RTI appeal, here's where to seek help
SEBI's appellate authority dismissed Ramapati Kuar's RTI appeal on 2 November 2026. The appeal concerned information about a PACL certificate's refund and the land shown against it.

What this means for you
This order is about one investor's RTI appeal over her PACL certificate and the land shown against it. If your money is also stuck in PACL and you want to know your refund status, the order says such matters are handled by the Justice (Retd.) R.M. Lodha Committee. PACL-related public notices, press releases, status reports and FAQs are also available on SEBI's website.
Key facts
- Appeal No. 7131 of 2026, filed by Ramapati Kuar
- RTI application dated 3 October 2026
- SEBI replied on 6 October 2026
- Order of the appellate authority dated 2 November 2026
- Refund and disposal of PACL properties rest with the Justice (Retd.) R.M. Lodha Committee
- The committee was set up under the Supreme Court's order of 2 February 2016
SEBI’s appellate authority passed an order on 2 November 2026 in an RTI appeal linked to PACL. The appeal was filed by Ramapati Kuar, who had sought details about her PACL certificate’s refund and the land shown against it.
What the case was about
According to the order, the appellant filed an RTI application on 3 October 2026. She asked for details such as the plot or khasra number of the land shown as allotted, the village, tehsil and district, the area of land, the name of the PACL project, and copies of related land documents. She also asked whether the record shows an actual allotment, registration or possession, or only an allotment entry in the data given by PACL Ltd.
SEBI replied on 6 October 2026. As per the order, SEBI said the information sought is not available with it. SEBI also said that all communication about refund status is handled by the Justice (Retd.) R.M. Lodha Committee and advised the appellant to approach it. SEBI further pointed to PACL-related public notices, press releases, status reports and FAQs on its website.
What the authority said
The appellant was not satisfied with SEBI’s reply and filed an appeal. After going through the application, the reply and the appeal, the authority noted that SEBI had clearly stated the information is not with it. The order cited a Central Information Commission decision of 8 July 2013, which held that if a body does not have the information, it cannot invent it.
The authority also recorded that the responsibility for disposing of PACL’s properties and repaying investors rests with the Justice (Retd.) R.M. Lodha Committee, constituted under the Supreme Court’s order of 2 February 2016.
What happens now
The authority found no deficiency in SEBI’s response and dismissed the appeal. The order notes that the appellant may be guided by the Lodha Committee and the information already available in the public domain on SEBI’s website.
Questions and answers
Where can I get information about my PACL refund?
According to the order, refund-related matters are handled by the Justice (Retd.) R.M. Lodha Committee, so that is where you should reach out. PACL public notices, press releases, status reports and FAQs are also on SEBI's website.
Why did SEBI say it could not give the information?
SEBI said the information sought is not available with it. The appellate authority held that information a body does not have cannot be provided.
What was the outcome of the appeal?
The appellate authority found no deficiency in SEBI's reply and dismissed the appeal.
What is the Lodha Committee?
It is a committee chaired by Justice (Retd.) R.M. Lodha, set up under the Supreme Court's order of 2 February 2016. As per the order, it is entrusted with disposing of PACL's properties and repaying investors.
Source: SEBI, "Appeal No. 7131 of 2026 filed by Ramapati Kuar", 2 November 2026. Read the original notice
Checked against the official notice: 3 November 2026. This story was drafted with AI from an official notice and checked by an editor before publishing. Report an error